Positive signals from the supplier industry

Published:

Norwegian industrial managers report a production level increase as well as growth in employment in the first quarter of the year. The positive trend is expected to continue in the second quarter, and especially for suppliers to the oil gas industry.

The business tendency survey for the first quarter of 2019 shows a positive development in total industrial production compared to the last quarter of 2018. The growth is particularly strong among producers of capital goods who report increased production, but also producers of intermediate goods and consumer goods gives a positive evaluation of the activity level in the first quarter.

Growth in oil investments and increased contract volume for the supplier industry have given rise to a higher level of activity and the industrial leaders now report increasing growth in employment in the first quarter of 2019.

Figure 1. Production and employment for manufacturing. Changes from previous quarter. Smoothed seasonally adjusted

Turning point value Total volume of production Average employment
Q1-2010 50 50.02 44.54
Q2-2010 50 51.33 45.43
Q3-2010 50 52.03 46.99
Q4-2010 50 53.23 50.45
Q1-2011 50 55.35 53.88
Q2-2011 50 55.91 54.71
Q3-2011 50 55.06 54.23
Q4-2011 50 54.22 53.63
Q1-2012 50 53.23 53.64
Q2-2012 50 52.47 54.07
Q3-2012 50 52.02 54.27
Q4-2012 50 51.02 53.16
Q1-2013 50 49.77 52.29
Q2-2013 50 50.83 52.37
Q3-2013 50 52.63 51.59
Q4-2013 50 54.01 50.59
Q1-2014 50 54.51 49.97
Q2-2014 50 52.99 49.73
Q3-2014 50 51.21 49.89
Q4-2014 50 50.47 48.98
Q1-2015 50 48.24 45.12
Q2-2015 50 46.23 41.02
Q3-2015 50 46.64 39.07
Q4-2015 50 47.59 39.41
Q1-2016 50 48.77 41.11
Q2-2016 50 49.06 42.17
Q3-2016 50 47.37 42.01
Q4-2016 50 46.87 42.73
Q1-2017 50 48.12 44.96
Q2-2017 50 49.14 47.40
Q3-2017 50 50.42 49.67
Q4-2017 50 51.45 50.61
Q1-2018 50 52.33 50.51
Q2-2018 50 54.28 51.19
Q3-2018 50 55.48 52.49
Q4-2018 50 55.98 54.05
Q1-2019 50 56.81 56.07

New orders from the domestic market is increasing

The total stocks of orders have increased for the sixth consecutive quarter and it is particularly producers of capital goods and consumer goods that report growth in the first quarter. Increased new orders from the domestic market is the main reason for the growth in the volume of new orders, but also the export market report an increase in the total level of new orders in the first quarter of the year.

The results from the first quarter indicate that the more export-oriented part of Norwegian industry has a somewhat weaker development in demand. Producers of intermediate goods still report an increase of numbers of new orders from the export market, but fewer managers than in the fourth quarter of the last year report growth.

Figure 2. New orders received for manufacturing. Changes from previous quarter. Smoothed seasonally adjusted

Turning point value New orders received from home markets New orders received from export markets
Q1-2010 50 46.91 47.59
Q2-2010 50 50.77 51.68
Q3-2010 50 53.53 53.37
Q4-2010 50 55.36 54.24
Q1-2011 50 57.29 53.43
Q2-2011 50 56.91 50.57
Q3-2011 50 54.89 48.14
Q4-2011 50 55.03 47.25
Q1-2012 50 55.12 48.07
Q2-2012 50 52.56 48.86
Q3-2012 50 49.80 46.58
Q4-2012 50 49.08 44.63
Q1-2013 50 48.18 45.01
Q2-2013 50 48.86 47.98
Q3-2013 50 50.65 52.41
Q4-2013 50 50.77 54.93
Q1-2014 50 50.07 54.84
Q2-2014 50 49.86 53.06
Q3-2014 50 48.23 49.57
Q4-2014 50 46.30 46.10
Q1-2015 50 44.46 43.53
Q2-2015 50 43.19 42.23
Q3-2015 50 43.20 43.34
Q4-2015 50 44.33 44.05
Q1-2016 50 45.86 43.13
Q2-2016 50 46.85 42.47
Q3-2016 50 47.35 43.53
Q4-2016 50 49.11 45.75
Q1-2017 50 50.23 47.94
Q2-2017 50 50.03 49.53
Q3-2017 50 51.52 50.38
Q4-2017 50 53.56 51.89
Q1-2018 50 54.03 54.35
Q2-2018 50 54.01 55.78
Q3-2018 50 53.92 55.21
Q4-2018 50 53.81 53.65
Q1-2019 50 54.92 52.10

Every quarter, for just over two years now, a price increase has been reported both in the home and export market. Hence the positive trend continues in the first quarter of 2019, with price growth in both markets for overall manufacturing. At the same time, industry leaders report a lower growth rate for export prices. Producers of consumer goods reported the highest growth rate for prices in both markets.

Figure 3. Prices on products for manufacturing. Changes from previous quarter. Smoothed seasonally adjusted

Turning point value Prices on products at home markets Prices on products at export markets
Q1-2010 50 46.72 45.52
Q2-2010 50 49.06 49.27
Q3-2010 50 51.36 51.55
Q4-2010 50 53.53 52.68
Q1-2011 50 55.80 52.84
Q2-2011 50 54.83 49.98
Q3-2011 50 52.60 46.55
Q4-2011 50 51.99 44.99
Q1-2012 50 51.88 45.55
Q2-2012 50 51.44 46.21
Q3-2012 50 51.89 45.44
Q4-2012 50 51.78 44.44
Q1-2013 50 51.10 45.04
Q2-2013 50 52.18 47.17
Q3-2013 50 53.12 50.00
Q4-2013 50 53.63 53.07
Q1-2014 50 54.40 53.30
Q2-2014 50 54.19 51.53
Q3-2014 50 53.40 50.79
Q4-2014 50 53.12 51.67
Q1-2015 50 51.09 50.61
Q2-2015 50 48.66 49.46
Q3-2015 50 48.20 49.77
Q4-2015 50 48.77 49.05
Q1-2016 50 49.64 47.91
Q2-2016 50 50.22 47.74
Q3-2016 50 49.88 47.81
Q4-2016 50 49.77 48.00
Q1-2017 50 50.44 49.67
Q2-2017 50 51.51 50.96
Q3-2017 50 53.06 52.17
Q4-2017 50 54.27 53.48
Q1-2018 50 55.60 55.29
Q2-2018 50 56.48 55.92
Q3-2018 50 56.54 55.05
Q4-2018 50 56.38 53.69
Q1-2019 50 56.56 52.59

Second quarter: Further growth is expected in manufacturing

The general outlook for the second quarter of 2019 is clearly positive for overall manufacturing, but the numbers of leaders that looks optimistic about the coming quarter is somewhat lower than in the previous survey. Optimism is also reflected in the indicator for future investments, where it is reported that approved investment plans are adjusted upwards. The positive picture is supported by expectations of growth in employment, new orders and total stocks of orders for the second quarter. If we look at the different product types, it is producers of capital goods who have the most optimistic outlook for the coming quarter.

Figure 4. General judgement of the outlook in next quarter for manufacturing

Turning point value Smoothed seasonally adjusted
Q1-2009 50 40.17
Q2-2009 50 43.98
Q3-2009 50 47.54
Q4-2009 50 50.26
Q1-2010 50 53.24
Q2-2010 50 56.05
Q3-2010 50 59.01
Q4-2010 50 61.00
Q1-2011 50 60.13
Q2-2011 50 57.55
Q3-2011 50 56.03
Q4-2011 50 56.04
Q1-2012 50 56.38
Q2-2012 50 56.19
Q3-2012 50 55.53
Q4-2012 50 55.13
Q1-2013 50 55.15
Q2-2013 50 55.01
Q3-2013 50 54.81
Q4-2013 50 54.70
Q1-2014 50 54.15
Q2-2014 50 53.36
Q3-2014 50 51.63
Q4-2014 50 48.52
Q1-2015 50 45.37
Q2-2015 50 43.45
Q3-2015 50 42.96
Q4-2015 50 44.21
Q1-2016 50 46.88
Q2-2016 50 50.42
Q3-2016 50 53.04
Q4-2016 50 53.85
Q1-2017 50 54.23
Q2-2017 50 55.06
Q3-2017 50 56.72
Q4-2017 50 58.28
Q1-2018 50 59.08
Q2-2018 50 58.83
Q3-2018 50 59.12
Q4-2018 50 60.49

The industrial confidence indicator for the first quarter of 2019 was 6.9 (seasonally-adjusted net figures). This is somewhat lower than the result from the previous quarter, but it still indicates growth in the production volume. A decrease of both producer of intermediate goods and consumer goods was the cause of the fall of the industrial confidence indicator. For producer of capital good the indicator remained more or less as the same level. Values above zero indicate that total output will grow in the forthcoming quarter, while values below zero indicate that total output will fall. International comparisons of the industrial confidence indicator are available from Eurostat (EU), The Swedish National Institute of Economic Research and Statistics Denmark.

1 Industrial confidence indicator is the arithmetic average of the answers (balances) to the questions on production expectations, total stock of orders and inventories of own products (the latter with inverted sign).

Figure 5. Industrial confidence indicator¹

Seasonally adjusted Average 1990-2019
Q1-2010 3.2 3.2
Q2-2010 4.5 3.2
Q3-2010 8.8 3.2
Q4-2010 11.1 3.2
Q1-2011 9.1 3.2
Q2-2011 8.5 3.2
Q3-2011 5.6 3.2
Q4-2011 6.0 3.2
Q1-2012 9.0 3.2
Q2-2012 6.4 3.2
Q3-2012 0.8 3.2
Q4-2012 4.8 3.2
Q1-2013 1.4 3.2
Q2-2013 1.2 3.2
Q3-2013 6.2 3.2
Q4-2013 8.0 3.2
Q1-2014 6.5 3.2
Q2-2014 6.3 3.2
Q3-2014 1.7 3.2
Q4-2014 -1.7 3.2
Q1-2015 -3.6 3.2
Q2-2015 -9.0 3.2
Q3-2015 -6.6 3.2
Q4-2015 -8.3 3.2
Q1-2016 -6.6 3.2
Q2-2016 -2.7 3.2
Q3-2016 -3.9 3.2
Q4-2016 -0.6 3.2
Q1-2017 1.7 3.2
Q2-2017 2.9 3.2
Q3-2017 3.4 3.2
Q4-2017 6.3 3.2
Q1-2018 7.0 3.2
Q2-2018 9.3 3.2
Q3-2018 8.7 3.2
Q4-2018 8.7 3.2
Q1-2019 6.9 3.2

Lack of qualified labor force limits production

The share of managers reporting that weak demand and strong competition were limiting factors for production was reduced in first quarter of 2019. At the same time, there is an increase in the numbers of leaders who report that a lack of qualified labor force is a challenge in order to increase production further.

In figure 6 below shows how the indicators that represent resource shortage have increased since the bottom of 2016, while demand and competition represent a minor challenge for manufacturing.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Bottlenecks in production in current quarter. Smoothed seasonally adjusted

The average capacity utilisation for Norwegian manufacturing has declined slightly, and was calculated to 79.3 per cent at the end of the first quarter of 2019.The corresponding figure for the fourth quarter was 79.5 per cent. This is below the historical average of 80.2 per cent. International comparisons of average capacity utilisation are available from Eurostat (EU).

Figure 7. Capacity utilisation in per cent for manufacturing

Smoothed seasonally adjusted Average 1990-2019
Q1-2010 77.1 80.16
Q2-2010 77.8 80.16
Q3-2010 78.5 80.16
Q4-2010 78.9 80.16
Q1-2011 79.5 80.16
Q2-2011 79.8 80.16
Q3-2011 79.6 80.16
Q4-2011 79.6 80.16
Q1-2012 79.7 80.16
Q2-2012 79.7 80.16
Q3-2012 79.8 80.16
Q4-2012 79.8 80.16
Q1-2013 79.4 80.16
Q2-2013 79.3 80.16
Q3-2013 79.5 80.16
Q4-2013 80.0 80.16
Q1-2014 80.4 80.16
Q2-2014 80.5 80.16
Q3-2014 80.1 80.16
Q4-2014 79.3 80.16
Q1-2015 78.4 80.16
Q2-2015 77.4 80.16
Q3-2015 76.7 80.16
Q4-2015 76.9 80.16
Q1-2016 77.1 80.16
Q2-2016 77.2 80.16
Q3-2016 77.0 80.16
Q4-2016 76.9 80.16
Q1-2017 77.1 80.16
Q2-2017 77.6 80.16
Q3-2017 77.8 80.16
Q4-2017 77.8 80.16
Q1-2018 78.3 80.16
Q2-2018 78.8 80.16
Q3-2018 79.3 80.16
Q4-2018 79.5 80.16
Q1-2019 79.3 80.16

Timelines

The survey data was collected in the period from 8 March to 23 April 2019.

Contact